Showing posts with label community. Show all posts
Showing posts with label community. Show all posts

Thursday, May 7, 2015

Hangout on Air: Building Community in Your Classes

Join me on Monday, May 11th at 4pm PT/7pm ET for this Hangout on Air!

Join in on the back channel with #AISMOOC.


The purpose of this Hangout on Air is to learn how to cultivate, grow and leverage vibrant communities in a virtual or blended class and share instructional strategies that will maximize the potential of the community to boost learning in your virtual classes.

Chris Long will be facilitating this HoA, which is in support of the Virtual Classroom MOOC he is currently teaching for UCI Extension’s Advanced Instructional Strategies in the Virtual Classroom offered through Coursera. Everyone is invited to view and ask questions!

Participants:
  • Chris Long, AIS MOOC Instructor and Technology Coordinator for Huntington Beach Union High School District
  • Michelle Pacansky-Brock, Teaching and Learning Innovation Specialist at CSU Channel Islands, Associate Faculty at Mt. San Jacinto College
  • David Theriault, High School English Literature Teacher
  • Matt Payne, online student

How to view:

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

#ET4Online Reflections: The Shifting Nature of Conferences in the Connected Age


Last week, I attended the 8th Annual OLC/MERLOT International Symposium of Emerging Technologies for Online Learning (#ET4Online) in Dallas, TX with over 600 other educators in person and roughly another 500 (going from memory on this figure) who attended virtually.  Over the past several days, I've been reading Tweets and blog reflections shared by attendees.  This conference will re-emerge in April 2016 with a new title, OLC Innovate: Innovations in Blended and Online Learning (to be held in New Orleans in April 2016). The transformation of the conference is significant, as there are many elements shifting in the conferencing landscape.

I had a moment during Mimi Ito's keynote that made me pause. Dr. Ito asked each member of the audience to hold up a thumbs up or thumbs down to indicate their perception of the impact technology has on young people today.  I was stunned to see how many thumbs down I observed -- in an audience of online educators. Changing this attitude is important. If we, as educators, do not value the potential of the connected age, how can we design and facilitate learning experiences that empower students to harness the opportunities presented to us?

#ET4Online showed that use of Twitter in higher ed edtech circles has matured (and the conversation continues, as you can see in the search widget below) and, as such, is deeply reshaping what it means to "attend" a conference. Rebecca Hogue (on-site in Dallas) and Maha Bali (attending virtually, based in Egypt) piloted an ET4Buddies concept. Using mobile video technologies, Rebecca pulled Maha into face-to-face conversations and events at the conference. Maha also participated as a panelist on the Women in EdTech: a Conversation and Messy Learning panels.  



On the Women in EdTech Panel, Maha noted her deep appreciation for Michael Berman (whom I have the pleasure of working with), an individual who supported Maha's efforts to get to Dallas in person this past year. After the conference, Jill Leafstedt (another colleague of mine) noted that she was impacted upon hearing Maha, in Egypt, speak of Michael's supportive efforts. Jill wrote on her blog, "working closely with Michael I already know he is a great mentor, but to hear this coming from someone halfway around the world was truly remarkable. I don't know if Michael and Maha have spent much time together face-to-face, but it was clear, Maha knew the same Michael that I knew and that this connection was having a deep and lasting impact on her career." What's fascinating is that Maha and Michael, to this day, have never met face-to-face. 

In Dallas, I sought out meeting Adam Croom after Laura Gibbs, over Twitter, strongly encouraged me to connect with him at the conference.  I did so and found myself excited and speaking about the ideas that Laura and I regularly share. Interestingly, I've never "met" Laura either. Yet, she has played a formative role in how I think about teaching online.  I also connected in person for the first time with Sam Eneman and Dave Goodrich, after years of online interactions.

Several people have noted how more meaningful the conversations were at ET4Online this year and in comparison to other edtech conferences. Patrice Torcivia said it best, "There were less power points and more crayongs; less talking at us and more listening; less structure and more messiness; less learning objectives and more learning subjectives."  I believe this is deeply interconnected with changes in the nature of relationships.  And, as such, I question what the phrase "attending a conference" means today.

Mimi Ito and Bonnie Stewart, two of the great general session speakers at the conference (Gardner Campbell is the third) mentioned "knowledge abundance" in their talks. As we continue to convene once a year in this context of knowledge abundance, we must be rethinking what "a conference" should be like -- structurally and procedurally. Mimi also has audience members use their smarphones to Tweet out findings from small group conversations and Bonnie showcased her powerful findings from her dissertation study, which examined how participation on Twitter shapes the identities of educators. 

How we define value is shifting in the social era.  Community and openness are valued more and the relevance of sitting and collecting/absorbing information from an expert is diminished.  Hopefully, these insights help us to identify with the preferences of our learners. 

One outcome of this connected age is a new sort of preciousness or aura of face-to-face experiences. We still long to be there together, but for different reasons. So, a good question to consider is, "Why do we attend conferences today?" Virtual relationships are flourishing. Faculty, IDs, instructional technologists, CIOs, and more are learning from each other beyond the edges of our institutions and the close of a conference.   When we are together in person, there seems to be a desire to spend time relating to each other as humans and less time passively receiving information. Patrice Torcivia reflected on her experiences at ET4Online (specifically in reference to the Women in EdTech Panel), "The conversation was raw, emotional, and transparent. ... We need as many conversations like this as it takes." I agree, Patrice. And, as such, I've heard many requests for shorter "sessions" and longer "open time" between these formal sessions to allow ample time for spontaneous conversations/learning/connections to occur.

What do you want OLC Innovate 2016 to look like? Let us know here (shout out to this year's amazing OLC Program Chair, Laura Pasquini, for developing this form!).







Monday, October 7, 2013

Online Learning...is it Really "Lifeless and Dull"?

What is the snowball effect?  When there's a systemic problem within an organization that creates a particular way of thinking and prevents organizational members from seeing valuable opportunities for improvement.

Today, I read an article at Education Week about the need to make schools "socioemotional places." I couldn't agree more with the main point of the article -- that education today has lost its focus on cultivating the socioemotional development of children, as standardized assessments have taken over the spotlight in the recent decade. I touched upon a similar topic in this related blog post back in April, 2012, which extends the relevance of this topic to college instruction.

But what I disagree with is how the article snowballs online learning into this very broad problem.  The authors state, "[Online learning] has several potential disadvantages, including: removing or minimizing the human interactions that are important to real learning; taking the joy and camaraderie out of education; isolating and limiting students’ voices and involvement; and making education lifeless and dull."  I agree that this can be true...but it's true for any type of class, depending on how it is designed and taught.  I would argue that if an online class is designed effectively and taught by an engaged, active instructor, an online class holds more potential to foster the socioemotional skills for more students in the class than in a face-to-face classroom.  In an online class, all students have a voice and more shy, reluctant students are likely to blossom and flourish. 

The words we use to frame topics are powerful and, as such, educators should recognize the interactive, human, and personalized learning experiences that online classes can bring to students -- experiences that may be difficult for some students to find in face-to-face classes.  This is a fragile moment in education and the conversations we have about online learning are critical.  Thirty two percent of college students is enrolled in at least one online class. Online class enrollments are increasing at the K12 level too, following the expansion we have seen in higher education. When an online class is designed with technologies that are collaborative and involve asynchronous voice and/or video interactions and facilitated by an active, engaged instructor who is visible, supportive, and provides frequent feedback to learners (in voice and video), learners are often more compelled to share, reflect, take risks, and feel like they are part of a connected community.

Recently, I asked some of my online students, "What makes an online class feel more human?" Here are some of their responses (shared with permission):


Join me for a free webinar this Wed, 10/9
Humanizing Your Online Class
12pm Pacific/ 3pm Eastern
Register here: 

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

VoiceThread Events-Learning Out Loud: Is it the Missing Link in Online Classes?


Learning Out Loud: Is it the Missing Link in Online Classes?

Friday, October 19th, 12pm PDT/ 3pm EDT

Free Webinar (Registration Required) 

Join me, Michelle Pacansky-Brock, author of Best Practices for Teaching with Emerging Technologies and associate faculty at Mt. San Jacinto College, as I shares the results of an ongoing study that seeks to discover how online, asynchronous voice discussions affect community college student learning at a distance. I will be joined by one of my former online students who will answer your questions and share her experiences.

In 2008, my online teaching studies showed evidence that VoiceThread, a web-based tool that gives users the choice to comment in voice or text, increases online community and enhances the instructor-to-student relationship. But over the years, I found that only 25% of my students regularly selected to comment in voice when given a choice.  I wanted to know why and understand how I could improve this percentage, as well as discover what what would happen if I was successful.

In this webinar, I will demonstrate a change I made in my online teaching approach in 2012 that resulted in an increase from 25% to 75% of my students choosing to participate with voice comments in class discussions.  I will show samples of the VoiceThread activities and present the students’ feedback about how this rich, humanized, online classroom affected students.

Register for this webinar here.



Hangout with Michelle and the VoiceThread Team

Wednesday, October 24th at 3pm PDT/ 6pm EDT

Join me, Michelle Pacansky-Brock, and a member of the VoiceThread team on Wednesday, October 24th at 3pm PDT/ 6pm EDT in a Google+ Hangout On Air.  This interactive environment provides seats for up to 10 people to engage in a video conversation and accommodates an unlimited number of online viewers. Come to ask questions about VoiceThread, share your ideas for using it in your class, or raise topics for discussion. To learn how to participate, visit the Hangout page of Michelle’s blog.

Friday, January 21, 2011

Learning Online is Like Dinner

Online learning is a lot like eating dinner.  It can be like a quick cruise through a drive through, providing a fast and convenient option for appeasing your hungry belly as you strive to meet the rest of your daily commitments. 

Online learning can also be like eating a warm, delicious home cooked meal amidst a group of friends or family.  This eating experience is different because sitting at the table involves more than just appeasing a hungry belly.  It provides opportunities for conversation, reflection, sharing, and good hearty debate.  Essentially, this meal involves being included in a community...even if just for a brief time.

Learning online is similar -- and each type of learning experience can serve a specific group of learners effectively.  Unfortunately, online students too frequently crave the home cooked meal but, instead, are delivered a bag with a burger and fries.

Imagine showing up at your mom's house for a family dinner and being greeted with a bag of McDonald's at the front door.  Imagine going to McDonalds for a quick bit and being expected to come in for an evening of conversation and discussion.  You likely wouldn't appreciate either scenario.

I think it's time for students to understand the type of meal they'll receive before they register in an online class rather than unveiling it on day one.

What are you serving this semester?