Lately, I've been contemplating the words that are generally used within higher education to describe learning environments. I wonder how differently online learning would be valued if we replaced the terms distance learning and face-to-face learning with online learning and offline learning.
What do you think?
5 comments:
I think that you have a just demonstrated the power of words!
If a class is in a classroom but they are online, what would you call that?
Hi Maryanne, thanks for stopping by! Michael, honestly, I think we need to get away from the need to label learning methods all together. If it's effective learning, that's all that matters. But I am really sensing the terms "distance learning" and "face to face learning" perpetuate a hierarchy that, to me, is problematic. What do YOU think? Good to hear from you.
-Michelle
Lots of people assume that "in-person" learning is automatically excellent, engaged, careful instruction with motivated students, and I think "face-to-face learning" perpetuates the belief. Surely none of us ever slept through a class, or skipped one, or had a professor who spent the whole class writing on a blackboard.
Maybe "face-to-face learning" should be broadened into "face-to-back learning", or "face-to-whoever-shows-up-that-day learning"? Just kidding.
I agree with you that effective learning can be done in any medium. I keep trying to think of new terminology that fits with the true importance of distance learning. But it all feels made-up. Like "mind-to-mind" instead of "face-to-face", or "equal opportunity learning", or something. It's a good discussion to have.
It sounds interesting. Replacing the words is not a bad idea at all. Sometimes, online learning and distance learning are kind of confusing but I definitely agree with you that language is power.
Post a Comment